Economic Statecraft

Online Description

Introduction — Techniques of statecraft — What is economic statecraft? — Thinking about economic statecraft — Economic statecraft in international thought — Bargaining with economic statecraft — National power and economic statecraft — “Classic cases” reconsidered — Foreign trade — Foreign aid — The legality and morality of economic statecraft — Conclusion — Afterword : economic statecraft : continuity and change / Ethan B. Kapstein.

🧭 60-Second Brief

• Core claim (1–2 sentences): Economic statecraft is a general means of influence—using instruments with market-denominated value—to shape others’ behavior; its utility has been underestimated because analysts conflate effectiveness with efficiency, ignore alternatives, and treat success/failure as binary.   

• Causal mechanism in a phrase: Influence by incentives and signals—adjusting others’ costs/benefits (carrots & sticks) and conveying intentions/resolve.   

• Paradigm & level(s) of analysis: Mid-range, instrument-focused analysis compatible with realism & liberalism; state and dyadic/systemic levels (comparative across tools). 

• Why it matters for policy/strategy (1–2 bullets):

  • Lets strategists shape the battlespace before force—including warning, reassurance, and time-buying—often at lower cost/risk than military options. 

  • Today’s toolkit (e.g., targeted/financial sanctions; dollar leverage) expands scalable, precise options aligned with war-prevention priorities.   

🧪 Theory Map (IR)

• Paradigm(s): Eclectic instrumentarian: compatible with realist power politics and liberal interdependence; centrally about means–ends choice. 

• Level(s) of analysis: State; Dyadic; Systemic (comparisons across techniques). 

• Unit(s) of analysis: Influence attempts (A seeks to change B with economic instruments). 

• Dependent variable(s): Behavioral change; altered beliefs/propensities; adjusted costs of compliance/non-compliance; audience perceptions.   

• Key independent variable(s): Instrument choice (positive/negative sanctions), credibility, difficulty, alternatives, domestic & third-party responses.   

• Causal mechanism(s): Incentives (carrots/sticks), signaling/indices that shape expectations; cumulative, accretive effects on capabilities and images.   

• Scope conditions: Multiple goals/targets; difficulty varies; outcomes graded not binary.   

• Observable implications / predictions: Expect mixed outcomes; signaling value even absent policy change; tool choice sensitive to comparative costs vs. alternatives.   

• Potential falsifiers / disconfirming evidence: Cases where clear, low-difficulty goals with viable alternatives see economic tools consistently underperform after accounting for signaling and cost-adjusted utility.

🎓 Course Questions (from syllabus)

1. How do states’ economic statecraft set the conditions and environmental context for military strategy?

2. How can economic statecraft support military strategy?

3. In what ways can tools of economic statecraft work to avoid armed conflict, elongate the time horizon toward an armed conflict, and serve as a way to communicate intentions?

4. What are parallel gradations between actions in the economic realm to escalation of conflict in the military realm?

5. How can economic statecraft undermine or serve as a constraint on military strategy?

6. Does Kapstein’s Afterword make relevant connections to the current strategic environment? Does it help you understand contemporary expressions of power and economic statecraft?

✅ Direct Responses to Course Questions

Q1. Setting conditions for military strategy

Answer: By shaping capabilities, incentives, and perceptions before force; adjusting access to resources/finance, strengthening or degrading adversary capacity, and managing images that condition crisis behavior. Baldwin emphasizes that countries continually manage images and others’ expectations—economic measures are part of that pre-military battlespace. (pp. xiii–xv; 98–106)    ✓

Q2. Supporting military strategy

Answer: Economic tools complement force by signaling resolve (e.g., embargoes/grain cuts as “I really mean it”), buying time, imposing costs, and tailoring pressure on sectors/actors (positive & negative sanctions). (pp. 350–376; 103; 40–42)      ✓

Q3. Avoiding conflict & communicating intentions

Answer: Economic statecraft extends the timeline, substitutes for early military moves, and signals intentions more credibly than words because it imposes costs; Baldwin frames this as crucial to superpower crisis management. (pp. 103; 350–376)    ✓

Q4. Parallel gradations to military escalation

Answer: From verbal protests → targeted licenses/tariffs → broad sectoral/financial sanctions → embargoes/cutoffs, each step raising costs/risks akin to military posture → shows-of-force → limited strikes → full use of force—with economic actions often preferred for scalable risk. (pp. 40–42; 98–106)    ✓

Q5. Constraints on military strategy

Answer: Economic measures can undermine military options if they provoke rally effects or over-promise; yet they also constrain war’s risks by providing credible non-kinetic signals. Baldwin highlights judging success by difficulty and comparative options rather than binary “works/doesn’t.” (pp. xiv–xv; 118–149; 350–376)      ✓

Q6. Kapstein’s Afterword & the current environment

Answer: Yes. Kapstein traces a renaissance of economic statecraft: targeted/financial sanctions, great-power economic competition (e.g., China’s BRI), and dollar-based leverage—all reinforcing Baldwin’s framework while updating tools and venues. (pp. 391–396; 400–421; 431–432)      ✓

📚 Section-by-Section Notes

Chapter 1: Introduction

• Purpose: Reframe economic statecraft as core statecraft, not a weak sideshow.

• Key claims: Conventional wisdom underrates economic tools; the study will compare how to think, not what to decide. (pp. 1–5)

Chapter 2: Techniques of Statecraft

• Purpose: Taxonomy—propaganda, diplomacy, economic, military.

• Key claims: Analyze tools comparably; instruments are properties distinct from power bases; compare tools because decision-makers face choices. (pp. 6–14, 21–23) 

Chapter 3: What Is Economic Statecraft?

• Purpose: Define the economic and list instruments.

• Key claims: Economic statecraft = influence using resources with money prices; includes negative (embargo, freezing assets) and positive (MFN, aid, purchase) sanctions; target can be indirect. (pp. 28–33, 40–42)   

Chapter 4: Thinking about Economic Statecraft

• Purpose: Clear analytical pitfalls.

• Key claims: Don’t treat economics as “abnormal” or apolitical; avoid binary success/failure; integrate with war-prevention priorities. (pp. 51–70)

Chapter 5: Economic Statecraft in International Thought

• Purpose: Intellectual lineage (from mercantilists to liberals).

• Key claims: Competing doctrines share means–ends focus; economic tools are longstanding instruments of power and order. (pp. 71–97)

Chapter 6: Bargaining with Economic Statecraft

• Purpose: Bargaining/signaling logic.

• Key claims: Symbols matter; economic moves send credible signals (costly, public, scalable), shape images, and can be calibrated to avoid kinetic escalation. (pp. 98–106) 

Chapter 7: National Power and Economic Statecraft

• Purpose: Assess utility & measurement.

• Key claims: Success is graded; consider difficulty and alternatives; efficiency ≠ effectiveness. (pp. 118–136) 

Chapter 11: The Legality and Morality of Economic Statecraft

• Purpose: Survey norms & ethics.

• Key claims: International law is murky; debate pits restriction vs defense of economic tools; war-prevention priority should guide legal reforms; morality ≠ utility. (pp. 350–376)     

Chapter 12: Conclusion

• Purpose: Policy-science caution and stakes.

• Key claims: Misreading economic statecraft narrows options and can push states toward war; scholars should clarify alternatives for decision-makers. (pp. 390–392) 

Afterword (Kapstein): Economic Statecraft—Continuity & Change

• Purpose: Update the toolkit & landscape.

• Key claims: Post–Cold War targeted sanctions surge; financial channels and dollar leverage matter; China’s BRI and trade politics reshape practice; the framework still fits. (pp. 391–396; 400–421; 431–432)     

🧩 Key Concepts & Definitions (author’s usage)

• Economic statecraft: Government influence attempts using instruments with a market price (e.g., trade, finance, aid). 

• Positive vs. Negative sanctions: Carrots (e.g., MFN, aid) vs. sticks (e.g., embargo, asset freezes). 

• Effectiveness vs. Efficiency: Achieving outcomes vs. outcomes at acceptable cost; policy choice is comparative. 

• Difficulty adjustment: Judge outcomes against the task’s difficulty. 

🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Actors & Perspectives

• Sender: Chooses economic means relative to other tools and costs.

• Target: Responds to costs, benefits, and signals; may rally or recalibrate.

• Audiences/Third parties: Interpret images; can amplify or offset effects. 

🕰 Timeline of Major Events

• 1985 — First edition: critical rethink of sanctions “conventional wisdom.”

• 1990s — Post–Cold War expansion of UN sanctions and targeted measures. 

• 2010s — Rise of financial sanctions; China’s BRI, outward/inward FDI, and aid reshape practice. 

• 2020s — Dollar leverage and institutional strain (WTO/Appellate Body) underscore continuity & change.   

🧠 Policy & Strategy Takeaways

• Do comparative math: Choose tools by relative utility (effect + cost + difficulty), not “does it work?” binaries. 

• Exploit signaling: Use costly-but-scalable economic moves to convey resolve and avoid premature force. 

• Design precision: Prefer targeted/financial levers when broad pain risks rally effects or collateral harm. 

• Legal/ethical lens: Law is contested; keep war-prevention as the first-order criterion; morality is not reducible to utility.   

⚔️ Comparative Placement in the IR Canon

• Closest kin: Schelling (coercion/signaling); Hirschman (power & trade interdependence).

• Differs from “sanctions pessimists”: Rejects binary tests and urges cross-tool comparisons and difficulty adjustments. 

🧐 Critical Reflections

• Strengths: Clear conceptual toolkit; cross-tool comparability; emphasis on signals & alternatives.

• Weaknesses / blind spots: Less on domestic politics and implementation constraints by design (flagged by the author).

• What would change your mind? Systematic evidence that, after cost/difficulty controls and signaling effects, economic tools still underperform direct military/diplomatic options in comparable cases.

❓ Open Questions for Seminar

• When do positive incentives outperform negative sanctions for signaling?

• How do financial networks and currency dominance alter escalation ladders?

✍️ Notable Quotes (with pages)

• “Success is a matter of degree… Foreign policy undertakings rarely completely succeed or completely fail.” (p. xiv) 

• “Efficiency takes into account both effectiveness and the costs… judgments based solely on effectiveness can be highly misleading.” (p. xiv) 

📝 Exam Drills

• Likely prompt: “Explain how Baldwin’s framework guides the choice between economic and military instruments in crisis bargaining.”

  Skeleton answer:

  1. Define the problem & goals/targets (multi-goal, multi-audience). 

  2. Compare tools by efficiency (effectiveness + cost + difficulty; signaling value).   

  3. Select scalable economic moves to communicate resolve and buy time while holding military options in reserve; justify within legal/ethical war-prevention priority.   

---